Ji Sung Nam vs Jurij Rodionov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 12:02 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sung Nam vs J. Rodionov

KOR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

AUT
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nam 0 - 1 Rodionov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ji Sung Nam winning 1 and Jurij Rodionov winning 2. The last match between Jurij Rodionov and Ji Sung Nam was at the Taipei Challenger, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(3) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nam | 0 |
| Rodionov | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Taipei Challenger(11-04-25)
J. S. Nam vs J. Rodionov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,445 | Career Prize Money | $530,915 |
| 56.31% (308-239) | Career Total W/L | 56.64% (320-245) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.00% (3-1) |
J. S. Nam vs J. Rodionov Match Preview:
- Is second serve performance a key factor? Yes, Jurij Rodionov has a slight edge, winning 44.71% compared to Ji Sung Nam's 39.25% in the last 6 months.
- Return game comparison shows Jurij Rodionov wins 46.02% of opponent's second serve points, just ahead of Ji Sung Nam's 45.80%.
- On the first serve return, Ji Sung Nam leads with 28.78%, while Jurij Rodionov has 27.29%.
- Under pressure, Ji Sung Nam has a higher breakpoint saving rate at 56.28% versus Jurij Rodionov's 52.99%.
- In overall match performance last year, Ji Sung Nam has a slight edge with a 59.46% win rate compared to Rodionov's 58.67%.
- Surface performance shows both players excel on hard surfaces, each winning 62% of matches.
- Which player has faced tougher opponents? Jurij Rodionov, with opponents averaging a rank of 228.45 versus Ji Sung Nam's 405.86.
- In deciding sets, Rodionov shows greater resilience, winning 66% compared to Nam's 54%.
- The event level indicates Rodionov plays more at Challenger/ITF > $10K level, while Nam plays more at ITF $10K.
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing the upcoming match between Jurij Rodionov and Ji Sung Nam, several key statistics arise which suggest possible outcomes. Rodionov appears to possess a stronger second serve, challenging Nam's defensive capabilities.
Additionally, Rodionov demonstrates a slightly better performance when returning second serves, which can prove pivotal in strengthening his overall gameplay. However, Ji Sung Nam's ability to save breakpoints might offer him certain defensive advantages in crucial moments.
Considering the level of competition faced in recent months, Rodionov has consistently encountered more challenging opponents, potentially better preparing him for high-stakes situations.
Furthermore, Rodionov's higher success rate in deciding sets indicates stronger resilience under pressure, suggesting a robust mental edge.
Taking all these factors into account, Jurij Rodionov is predicted to be the more likely winner in this upcoming tennis match, based on his performance metrics and competitive experience.
Ji Sung Nam vs Jurij Rodionov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. S. Nam vs J. Rodionov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:51:1 | Average Match Time | 1:51:1 |
| 59% (52/88) | 1st Serve % | 69% (66/96) |
| 62% (32/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (46/66) |
| 58% (21/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
| 39% (37/96) | Return Points Win % | 40% (35/88) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
J. Rodionov Recent Matches Played

J. S. Nam vs J. Rodionov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.31% (308/239) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.64% (320/245) |
| 55.77% (691/548) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.10% (746/608) |
| 52.34% (6004/5468) | Games Win/Loss | 51.35% (6715/6362) |
| 57.92% (256/186) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.76% (84/64) |
| 50.00% (28/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.50% (109/91) |
| 50.00% (23/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.38% (116/73) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 39.29% (11/17) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1034 | Aces Total | 2812 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 969 | Total Double Faults | 1478 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:49 |
| 580.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 417.48 |
| 65% (14421/22187) | 1st Serve % | 61% (23874/39269) |
| 67% (9733/14421) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16826/23874) |
| 49% (3794/7766) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7622/15395) |
| 44% (1164/2644) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1422/3457) |
| 43% (9990/23356) | Return Points Win % | 38% (14610/38816) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 41.43% (29/41) |
| 49.77% (109/110) | Challenger W/L | 59.89% (215/144) |
| 61.71% (195/121) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (48/26) |
| 56% (298/531) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (314/555) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 54% (76/142) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (116/210) |
| 47% (73/154) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (114/220) |
| 86% (307/263) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (310/257) |
| 14% (307/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (310/53) |
| 19% (239/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (255/62) |